Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3974 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7500F - $67.25 vs $163.77
- Up to 50% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 7500F - $0.67 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 23% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 137 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
81.02189781021897%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53721 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
50.37593984962406%
Price, €
€181.79
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €181.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53731 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
19.132653061224488%
Multi-Core
1085
8.608378292605522%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |