Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 911 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $51.18 vs $87.75
- Up to 39% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-6700 - $0.22 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3210 - 273 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
253
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |