Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 723 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $51.18 vs $62.15
- Up to 17% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-2600K - $0.25 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3210 - 230 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
225
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18659 minutes ago
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |