Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3556 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $51.18 vs $182.78
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13600KF - $0.15 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3210 - 481 vs 373 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
373
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
481
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
35%
Price, €
€202.89
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |