Buy on Amazon
€56.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $51.18 vs $80.42
- Up to 18% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11400F - $0.32 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3210 - 227 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
177
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12250 minutes ago
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
82%
Price, €
€89.27
63%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.