Buy on Amazon
€56.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1463 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $35.17 vs $51.18
- Up to 35% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - $0.33 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.