Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 120 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3210 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $29.98 vs $51.18
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76651 minutes ago
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76651 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
91.87725631768953%
Multi-Core
1018
89.53386103781882%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |