Buy on Amazon
€56.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1463 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3210 - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $46.74 vs $51.18
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 55 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76568 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76568 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.