Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2101 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $51.18 vs $506.05
- Up to 89% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.34 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3210 - 183 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
169
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
11%
Price, €
€561.72
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |