Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $51.18 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3210 - 170 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76991 minutes ago
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
43.46712211784799%
Multi-Core
1018
13.503117124287039%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |