Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3396 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $6.58 vs $240.57
- Up to 97% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $0.04 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3210 - 201 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €7.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
3%
Price, €
€267.03
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €267.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |