Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $51.18 vs $51.41
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 31% better in Rust than Core i3-3210 - 204 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 22% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-3210 - $0.28 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€57.06
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €57.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |