Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2457 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - $51.18 vs $91.4
- Up to 39% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 3500X - $0.27 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3210 - 228 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 6 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
213
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3200 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
61%
Price, €
€101.45
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |