Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1934 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $51.18 vs $65.44
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3210 - 240 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76507 minutes ago
Buy for €72.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
41.14793856103476%
Multi-Core
1018
19.342580277408324%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |