Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $51.18 vs $60.01
- Up to 9% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.48 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3210 - 126 vs 118 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
118
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for €66.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |