Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2378 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3210 - 253 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $51.05 vs $51.18
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76389 minutes ago
Buy for €56.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
48.38403041825095%
Multi-Core
1018
33.78692333222701%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |