Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2670 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $51.18 vs $69.46
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 48% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3210 - 225 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-3210 - $0.34 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15737 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.1
73%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |