Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3145 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-11800H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 50% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3120M - 205 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3120M
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
