Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3504 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3110M - 153 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |