Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 56% better in Rust than Core i3-3110M - 235 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
389
17.07638279192274%
Multi-Core
802
10.360418550574861%
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
