Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4140 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $111.14 vs $318.06
- Up to 49% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - $1.37 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-2125 - 132 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
90
68%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
51%
Price, €
€353.05
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |