Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $111.14 vs $190.11
- Up to 37% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900KF - $0.73 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i3-2125 - 183 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
168
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
63%
Price, €
€211.02
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |