Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4509 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $111.14 vs $270.23
- Up to 52% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-14700F - $0.74 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-2125 - 195 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 28 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
166
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16763 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
48%
Price, €
€299.95
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |