Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3229 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $111.14 vs $329.04
- Up to 62% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.49 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i3-2125 - 281 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
252
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for €365.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |