Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2189 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $43.86 vs $281.51
- Up to 83% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-7940X - $0.15 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-2120T - 349 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 28 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
317
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |