Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $43.86 vs $335.86
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900K - $0.13 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-2120T - 492 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
369
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
492
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
17%
Price, €
€372.8
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |