Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-2120T - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $29.18 vs $36.57
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €40.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
72.80550774526678%
Multi-Core
816
82.25806451612904%
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |