Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 415 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8300 - $43.86 vs $81.91
- Up to 46% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - $0.32 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-2120T - 155 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
153
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12365 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |