Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $35.83 vs $307.06
- Up to 85% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900F - $0.51 vs $3.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Remnant II than Core i3-2100 - 102 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
78
76.47058823529412%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.34/FPS
15.269461077844312%
Price, €
€340.84
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |