Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $35.83 vs $67.25
- Up to 47% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-3220 - $0.23 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-2100 - 157 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
155
98.72611464968153%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
53.48837209302326%
Price, €
€74.65
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
88.76190476190476%
Multi-Core
954
87.92626728110598%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |