Buy on Amazon
€39.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $35.83 vs $46.74
- Up to 22% better value when playing Valheim than Celeron G3930 - $0.21 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-2100 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
190
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.