Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 652 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 155 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $27.05 vs $35.83
- Up to 23% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-2100 - $0.2 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16123 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |