Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 212 vs 182 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $59.8 vs $81.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-14100F - $0.36 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €90.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |