Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $80.43 vs $343.65
- Up to 77% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900K - $0.43 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-14100F - 208 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
206
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10167 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
23%
Price, €
€381.45
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €381.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |