Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 36% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G6900 - 171 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $54.68 vs $87.73
- Up to 16% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-14100F - $0.48 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |