Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1924 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 389 vs 351 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $81.87 vs $540.34
- Up to 87% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.23 vs $1.71 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 48 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
389
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €90.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
351
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
13%
Price, €
€599.78
15%
Buy for €599.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 250 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |