Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-9100F - 222 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - $84.08 vs $101.64
- Up to 10% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-14100 - $0.46 vs $0.51 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €112.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
204
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |