Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4986 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Phenom II X4 925 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
14.047410008779632%
Multi-Core
930
12.013951685828705%
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
