Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 88% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 483 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $39.15 vs $92.92
- Up to 19% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-13100 - $0.17 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 54 vs 60 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
483
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
80.95238095238096%
Price, €
€103.14
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €103.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
53.20910973084886%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
27.34132268086995%
Multi-Core
1051
14.324655853891235%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |