Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 15% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8120 - 315 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $57.05 vs $98.69
- Up to 34% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-13100 - $0.23 vs $0.35 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €109.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |