Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3782 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-4130 - 187 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $38.04 vs $92.92
- Up to 53% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-13100 - $0.26 vs $0.55 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
47.27272727272727%
Price, €
€103.14
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €103.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44034 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
162
86.63101604278076%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |