Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 315 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $62.14 vs $185.71
- Up to 65% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900K - $0.3 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i3-12100F - 243 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
233
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
35%
Price, €
€206.14
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |