Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3558 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - 195 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $69.45 vs $127.96
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - $0.4 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 58 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |