Buy on Amazon
€77.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $97
Availability
MSRP in USD: $97
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4034 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-2400 - 236 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-2400 - $0.33 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $58.99 vs $69.45
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ 12th Gen i3-12100F desktop processor, featuring PCIe Gen 5.0 & 4.0 support, DDR5 and DDR4 support. Discrete graphics required.
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
OptiPlex Desktop Computer - Intel Core i5 i5-2400 3.10 GHz - Mini-tower
Buy for €65.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.