Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i3-9100F - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $41.67 vs $69.45
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-12100F - $0.31 vs $0.48 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
64%
Price, €
€77.09
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18468 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
151
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €46.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |