Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4167 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Core i3-560 - 215 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 58 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $43.86 vs $69.45
- Up to 28% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-12100F - $0.26 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
72%
Price, €
€77.09
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
189
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 73 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |