Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2826 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 195 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $30.07 vs $69.45
- Up to 50% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-12100F - $0.2 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 54 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |