Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Celeron G6900 - 286 vs 279 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $43.86 vs $69.45
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-12100F - $0.17 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
62%
Price, €
€77.09
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17885 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |