Buy on Amazon
€77.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $97
Availability
MSRP in USD: $97
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3340 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 27% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - 157 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $27.05 vs $69.45
- Up to 51% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i3-12100F - $0.24 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
48%
Price, €
€77.09
38%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ 12th Gen i3-12100F desktop processor, featuring PCIe Gen 5.0 & 4.0 support, DDR5 and DDR4 support. Discrete graphics required.
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 58 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.