Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 933 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - 131 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $60.68 vs $69.45
- Up to 8% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-12100F - $0.54 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
91%
Price, €
€77.09
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10673 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |