Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 4012 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 34% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-860 - 122 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
